Saturday, March 31, 2007

These Pretzels Are Making Me Thirsty

As March slowly draws to its eventual and inevitable end, I cannot help but look back at the last quarter-year that has been, and though I strongly believe in the fact that I am a straightforward and simple being, the set of emotions that slowly take possession of me are by no means uncomplicated.

The last three months have gone by in a whirlwind of activity; a fact that I now become acutely aware of, on looking back at the period in question, completely occupied as I have been throughout its duration, and therefore unable to notice just how frenzied life has been of late.
There have been classes, those indescribable, insufferable occurrences that I had almost forgotten existed over the six month period I spent away from IIT. There have been projects, presentations, tutorials, submissions, and consequently, deadlines, a word I now remember exactly how much I dreaded before, and have come to dread even more, if possible. There have been outings with friends, outings with family members, get-togethers, parties, treats, weddings that I just can't seem to have wheedled my way out of, relatives visiting, closer relatives leaving, seemingly countless trashy movies, followed by a couple of good ones, minor tests, debates, mostly bad, both in India as well as across the border, both as a speaker and as an adjudicator, the fact that the ones I adjudicated were consistently worse than the ones I participated in making the entire situation even more grueling to endure, cultural festivals, technical festivals, seminars, more minor tests, arguments with parents, arguments with friends, unnecessary complications, irate professors, quizzing events, marketing meetings, filling up of forms and other variations of needless paperwork, and people who, for some strange reason I am yet to understand, can't seem to get enough of talking to me.

What makes the entire experience even more unbelievable and surreal is how starkly it contrasts with the six months I had spent immediately preceding it, lazing around, traveling, soaking up the sun, and spending much of my time reading.

However, I am not the one to complain. This year has been, if anything else, exhilarating. There has been, at any given point of time, loads to do, and somehow that always seems to spur me on.
The only possible reason I could have for complaint is that, somehow, time and time again, the social and academic aspects of my life seem to, ostensibly without fail, get in the way when the clock reads half past seven every weekday evening and I am compelled to forego, for the sake of fulfilling prior commitments, yet another installment of Seinfeld.

Any sane man, I firmly believe, must be allowed at least a few minutes of pure, unadulterated pleasure every day, and I have this niggling suspicion that whoever is in control is keeping me from experiencing my share of the joy.
Make no mistake, I am pretty darn pissed about it.

Things, however, are not as bleak as they seem to be on the Seinfeld front. Changes are most definitely afoot. The week that has just passed saw me managing to catch four out of a possible maximum of five episodes, due mainly to completely unexpected holidays on Monday and Tuesday, and a rather fortuitous timetable that ensures that I am free, for the most part, on Thursday and Friday afternoons.
Four out of five. Not bad, eh? Almost reaffirms my faith in myself.

I am, yet, the Lord of the Manor. The King of the Castle. The Master of my Domain.

8 Comments:

Blogger Puja said...

Kramer's run away to chicago it seems. Something about a key, I hear.

Incidentally,I have all seinfeld episodes from season 1-4. They don't work on my player however. Wrong region or something. Such is life.

7:41 pm, March 31, 2007  
Blogger The Reader said...

Why does it appear that you are posting for the heck of posting? No offence meant, of course.

- Saurabh

6:49 am, April 01, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Puja, he's caught the bug. The acting bug. Last I heard, he'd landed himself quite a part on Murphy Brown.

Saurabh, I do not claim to have any higher motives behind my work. I have always written for the sake of writing. It's just that you've been slower than usual in coming around to realizing it.
No offence meant, of course.

3:15 pm, April 01, 2007  
Blogger AP said...

I have all seinfeld.. if you want it, let me know.

1:49 pm, April 02, 2007  
Blogger The Reader said...

I want it. Can you please burn some CDs for me. I will take them when I come to IIT next. Of course, you get a little treat for doing this!

- Rustagi

10:21 am, April 03, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Anjul, when do I come along with my hard-disk? And how much space would I need?

Rustagi, if you want to carry on a conversation with Anjul, do it somewhere else, and not on my blog's comments section.
Thank you.

5:22 pm, April 07, 2007  
Blogger AP said...

You'll need about 14 GB.. a couple of seasons are high quality ones.

7:14 am, April 09, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Anjul, I shall be around.

11:43 am, April 09, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, March 26, 2007

I'm Mr. Brightside

Well. It's official. India has, without a doubt this time around, crashed out of the World Cup. And Greg Chappell will very probably be dead by the time you read this.

But being the eternal optimist that I am, I choose to see things in a more positive light. At least he hasn't been murdered as yet. Furthermore, as if that wasn't good news enough, I am not one of those thousands of crazed cricket followers who have made travel arrangements and ticket reservations worth crores of rupees to travel halfway around the world to be able to catch the by now sold-out Super Eight (How I hate that phrase. Never liked Super Six either, but at least that had the entire alliterative jig going for it.) match to be held on Sunday, the 15th of April, rubbing their hands together with glee and drooling copious amounts of, well, drool, keenly anticipating a succulent India-Pakistan encounter in Barbados in the offing.
They shall now all be fortunate enough to witness Ireland play Bangladesh, in probably the most evenly matched of the Super Eights; just the kind of encouragement the minnows (Never liked that word either. Reminds me of fish, a section of the Animal Kingdom I most singularly abhor.) need.

After all, isn't that what the Cricket World Cup is all about.

10 Comments:

Blogger Occasional Brilliance said...

nt a big cricket fan, bt evr thot tat mayb dis is d best thing 4 indian cricket? u need some kind of reality chk 2 shock u out f ur complacency n tk a gud hard look at urself n move forward, rite?

felt bad abt d woolmer thing tho...

5:07 am, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Gunjan Aylawadi said...

hey i came here thru mannz blog...n i think i knw u...IMS right??
nice blog...u write really well...bout d post, i am not really a cricket enthusiast but i wish we had done better!!

3:32 pm, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Mann, I am not really a cricket enthusiast either, but I was looking forward to the World Cup with much anticipation. And what did I get. A perfectly good team which came a cropper against substandard teams from neighbouring countries.
Surely, this is not the best thing for Indian cricket. If we needed a reality check, why couldn't we have gotten one during, say, a three match series against Bangladesh at home? Was it necessary to travel half the way across the world just to be publicly humiliated and get a reality check.
But then, I don't blame the cricketers. I blame the ICC. There is a time and a place for making weak nations play strong nations, and the World Cup is just not it. What we have on our hands now is a supposedly world-class tournament watered down thanks to the skewed format that the ICC advocates, with two ridiculously weak teams taking on the Titans of world cricket, all in the name of exposure, which means little more than proving, occasionally, that a weak team can, on a very good day, when playing out of their skins, by freak accident, in a one-off isolated match, defeat a good team hung-over from the previous evening.

It's crazy, effing crazy, if you ask me.

9:00 pm, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Gunj, I'm glad you like the way I write, and thank you for the comment. Do keep visiting.

As for IMS, please desist from citing the name ever again on this blog. Such vile, wicked and malevolent witchery shall not be dignified with a mention on this hallowed page.

9:10 pm, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Occasional Brilliance said...

nw m truly zapped... u actually sound lk my dad!!! [:O] papa... is this u pretending to be manu?

bt i agree... dr is a time n a place and it is effing crazy...

2:57 am, March 28, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

It is not mere coincidence that makes me speak like your father. I echo the views of about 80% of the Indian male population.
God save us from Australia-Ireland encounters.

7:24 pm, March 31, 2007  
Blogger Rishi said...

No, Manu, I don't think it is right to fault the ICC for India's debacle.

I also don't think the Sri Lankan outfit that we had lost to was substandard in any way. If anything was substandard, it was India's batting performance.

Even after being beaten by Bangladesh, we still would have progressed into the next round if we had won against the Lankans but we didn't have the fight in ourselves.

Rewind to the last World Cup (when we sprung back after the hiding at the hands of the Aussies at Centurion), and you'd know what I'm talking about.

If you had taken the time to see Australia vs South Africa or even Sri Lanka vs England, you'd know India and Pakistan had absolutely no business to be in the Super Eights.

And one ostensibly ridiculously weak team (freakishly?) defeated South Africa today. I hope you followed.

4:07 am, April 08, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Rishi, I am in no way condoning India's abysmal performance. They played pathetically, and paid for it. The team, as you correctly pointed out, didn't seem very keen on putting up a fight, even in a do-or-die situation. And seeing the general quality of matches in the Super Eight stage, I completely agree that, at least on present form, India would not have belonged.
However, and I don't believe you can argue against this, the presence of Bangladesh and Ireland in the Super Eights really does bring down the level of competition. Half the matches have completely lost their importance. And though Bangladesh can, as they have demonstrated a couple of times already, spring a few surprises, they will remain exactly that. Surprises.
As Graeme Smith said before the Bangladesh-South Africa match, any half-decent test-playing nation would defeat the Bangladeshi outfit 97 times out of a 100. What you do not want is one of those 3 times occurring during the World Cup.

India played badly, and Dav Whatmore has definitely done a wonderful job with the Bangladeshi team. But the fact remains, the Super Eights with India and Pakistan in them would have been more sensible, and infinitely more entertaining.

Unless you really do believe that team Bangladesh is genuinely better than team India, in which case you are completely justified in thinking the way you do.

Oh, and nice to have you back here. How have you been?

11:41 am, April 09, 2007  
Blogger Rishi said...

All I'm saying is that the team that plays better on the day wins, however cliched that may sound. I don't think they are genuinely better than us (In fact I know we'll ruthlessly whitewash them in May), but the fact remains that they played better than us on that day, and ended our World Cup dreams.

Sachin, Sourav and Dravid may have had 40,000 ODI runs between them coming into the Cup, but what did it amount to? Zaheer, Agarkar and Bhajji may have snared 500 wickets between them, yet they couldn't bowl Bangladesh out for less than 192.

And as for these "surprises" that Bangladesh springs, you could say the same for India's victory 24 years ago, or Sri Lanka's 11 years ago. I mean dude who would have imagined India upstaging the West Indians, and Sri Lanka defeating the Aussies? And look where they are now.

I have no problem with Bangladesh emerging as a cricketing power. So what if they get knocked out of the Super Eights? I think they've done their job.

I'm doing fine.

1:41 am, April 10, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Which is, in effect, exactly what I am saying as well. The team that plays better on the day wins, irrespective of how well (or poorly) they play throughout the rest of the year. What results, therefore, is a pattern that does not account for accidents (and I shall continue to refer to the India-Bangladesh match as one), and, consequently, a lopsided draw in a stage as crucial as the Super Eights of a competition as important as the World Cup.

But then, I guess that this is a generic aspect of all sports, and probably a contributing factor to the glorious uncertainties of any game.

It's good to know you're doing well. Do keep visiting.

7:34 pm, April 11, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 22, 2007

I, Robot


Mechanical Artificial Nullification Unit

Eerily apt, if you ask me. Especially the Nullification bit. Suits me well.

12 Comments:

Blogger AP said...

Its not even close in my case. I'm Artificial Networked Judo and Utility Lifeform.

Being you must surely be an interesting experience. Especially with that eerily female face. What's that, purple lipstick? Or is that what robots take to be a unicorn?

8:55 pm, March 22, 2007  
Blogger AP said...

And if you ask me again, the pic looks a lot like your real one on the right. Eerily so, but for the horn.

7:42 pm, March 23, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

First things first. Eerily. That word is being thrown around far too irresponsibly, which doesn't please me one bit.

Secondly, Anjul, that is most definitely not a female face, the mild features notwithstanding. Moreover, robots do not wear lipstick. The purple is just there to spruce up the dull white.

And I would, if I were you, strongly consider refraining from recklessly hurling around such insulting comments.
Behind those soft features lies a mean, lethal machine.

Any more offensive comments, and I shall be inclined, nay, forced to artificially nullify you.

2:32 pm, March 24, 2007  
Blogger AP said...

You're right. It suits you.

5:06 pm, March 24, 2007  
Blogger Phoenix said...

Very mean and lethal indeed, the purple.
Nullifier ha ha.

6:15 am, March 25, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Laugh all you want. I think the purple looks very dapper indeed.

There's no rule against looking good while nullifying, is there?

11:19 am, March 26, 2007  
Blogger Occasional Brilliance said...

the purple heart shaped mouth got me... :D

5:09 am, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

It is NOT heart-shaped. It is shaped like the Bat-Signal. Or like one of those Batarang things he throws about.
Again.
Mean, deadly weapon. Not heart.

Really, how many times must I go over this?

8:25 pm, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Occasional Brilliance said...

at least one more time ;P lk seeing u so... ummm... wts the wrd... "het up" heheheh

2:58 am, March 28, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yep. Nothing says 'Nullification' like those big shining black eyes...

2:40 pm, March 28, 2007  
Blogger Puja said...

Also, isn't he wearing a trendy purple turtleneck? He's a fashionable one. If one considers purple turtlenecks fashionable that is.

3:25 pm, March 28, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Go away, all of you.
I hate you guys.

4:55 pm, March 29, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

300

There are movies, and let it be known that the ones I talk about are precious few in number, that aren't merely movies, but existence altering visual spectacles that reaffirm your belief in your own ability to be influenced beyond your wildest dreams.
300 is one such movie.

It is almost impossible, I strongly believe, to watch a movie like 300 and not praise it publicly. Which is probably what prompts me to sit down in front of a computer at three in the morning, merely a few hours before my first minor test, with an aim to making it apparent, to all who would care to listen, exactly how brilliant the movie is.

The film reeks of virility. It's a two hour long testosterone driven slaughter-fest, with supercopious doses of overstated masculinity. It's like the film takes you by the testicles and yanks you into this world of sex and violence where men are real men, women are real women, and honour, duty and freedom are dicta people live, and die, by.
300 allows you to vent the frustration that is very much an integral part of being a male in contemporary society. For two hours, 300 allows you to feel like a real man. Within these couple of hours, you long for combat, you guiltlessly lust after women, you hunger for blood, and you crave for battle. Within these couple of hours, you can give yourself up to your baser instincts, to feelings of rigidity, of absolute and irrefutable power, of stubborn devotion to duty and intransigent truths, of intolerance, of honour unto the very end, and of intrinsic superiority. Which is probably why you walk out of the cinema hall so fulfilled and satisfied, for once having been able to let out that part of your self which society deems unfit for public portrayal.


The screenplay is beautifully done, as I am sure anyone who has read the graphic novel would agree. Each frame is a work of art. The slow-motions are cringe-inducing, coupled with one of the most haunting soundtracks I have been fortunate enough to come across in recent times. When the arrows fall, you are nearly compelled to duck for cover, and as bodies get de-limbed and heads get severed, you almost cower in your seats, eyes half-closed, expecting the warm spatter of freshly spilt blood that abounds on screen, ominously threatening, to drench you and run slowly down your skin.
And when I say blood, I do not mean the sickly pale-red, syrupy variety that we seem to come across so often in most movies these days. What I am talking about is thick, dark and rich, globular liquid, viscous enough to give my fluid dynamics professor pause.

The narration is impeccable, with Dilios (David Wenham, of Faramir fame) taking over the reins from the narrator in the Frank Miller version. The dialogue is brilliantly written, but this, once again, I would mostly, although not wholly, attribute to the graphic novel. What the movie has intended to do, and undeniably succeeded in doing, is to start with the graphic novel as a basic stepping stone, and then build upon it to achieve a level of spectacle seldom seen before. The movie, and I do expect and eagerly anticipate quite a bit of opposition to this belief, more than lives up to the graphic novel, and achieves so much more.

For then there is Lena Headey, who as Queen Gorgo, is simply awe-inspiring. She brings into the character the intensity and toughness it needs, without once compromising on her feminity. Her strong face, set defiantly through much of the movie, only serves to reinforce her womanliness, and her very feminine concerns about her husband and her son. She becomes the cornerstone of the entire movie in that brief moment when she faintly nods in tacit approval when Leonidas asks her to decide the fate of the Persian emissary who comes asking for 'Land and Water'. In that one brief moment, I am quite sure I fell in love with her about a million times.
And how she works magic with a single, coarse, unadorned piece of simple white cloth is something that can only be experienced by watching the movie, and for that magic alone, if nothing else, the movie is worth watching.

11 Comments:

Blogger kanika said...

your 'review' provided that little extra push i needed to overcome my irresolution regardin watchin d movie!!

6:13 pm, March 21, 2007  
Blogger Phoenix said...

i love the Queen too. Though as usual your reactions are a bit too exaggerated. nice movie, nonetheless.
Loved Leonidas.

1:00 pm, March 22, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Kanika, glad I could help.

Phoenix, my reactions are always exaggerated. Which is what makes being me such an interesting experience.

6:28 pm, March 22, 2007  
Blogger Robert Frust said...

It is rather surprising to know how deeply the film made an impression on your young mind. Nevertheless, some parts mirrored my own feelings so well I'm glad I read this review before penning my own.
I wanted to write one after Casino Royale too, but sadly that remains on my computer along with a dozen other posts (well) begun but only half done.
Stop flirting with Phoenix.

6:24 pm, March 24, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Mr. Frust, always glad to help, in any way possible.
I am, however, not a little piqued, I must admit, by the entire 'young mind' bit.

And I shall flirt with whomever I please, whenever I please. Especially on my own blog.

11:26 am, March 26, 2007  
Blogger Occasional Brilliance said...

hey... i ran in2 ur blog by accident... ok tats a lie... i read it a few times bt wsnt 2 sure abt commentin... (i'm shy, i cnt help it... :P) bt i did c 300 n m in cmplete agreement wid u...

my fav line - queen gorgo - "because only spartan women give birth to real men"

p.s - u rite relly well... :D

5:04 am, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Mann, I am glad you liked the blog. Please do keep visiting and commenting.
300, I agree, was a cracker of a movie.

And I didn't really need to know about all that ailed you before you chose to leave a comment here. Too much detail, I would call it.
But then, we all live and learn.

8:13 pm, March 27, 2007  
Blogger Puja said...

I thought xerxes eyebrows were a little too thin. I don't see why it had to be that way. Idiotic, if you ask me.

7:54 pm, March 31, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Puja, I didn't really notice the eyebrows. Are they supposed to be that important?

11:46 am, April 09, 2007  
Blogger SDK said...

Hi
I actually did run into your blog by accident and liked a lot of it.

But,this is a post which I have to disagree with. I was totally smitten by the trailer and kept shouting "THIS IS SPARTA" or "TONIGHT WE DINE IN HELL" bits, but, the movie, I am afraid, was well below my expectation.It was stylish all right and the la Sin City look did make it special, but, the story was not grand enough for my liking.

But then, to each his own. Keep on writing.

12:44 am, February 26, 2008  
Blogger Empy said...

ominously threatening????

5:15 pm, March 23, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Hair and Now

For the first time in a period of a little over two years, my hair is exactly like it appears on the right. Not any longer. Not any shorter. And not worn any other way.

All of you, therefore, who happen to possess the good fortune of seeing me over the course of the next couple of days, will find me looking quite like I look in the picture, except for the fact that I probably won't be in the middle of voicing my displeasure in the form of a particularly violent expletive, as I can be seen doing in the picture.
But then again, given the strange set of circumstances I seem to find myself in these days, I might well be.
I apologize for the inconvenience. I mean, in most cases, no, and in some, very minimal, offense.

6 Comments:

Blogger AA said...

The configuration of your face in the picture does not seem very conducive to the proper enunciation of the more vile expletives.

However, it is possible that you are pronouncing judgment in a fashion unfamiliar to me.

8:07 am, March 10, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Likely. Quite likely.
We must all be allowed our indulgences when it comes to preferences in profanities, I say.

6:46 pm, March 10, 2007  
Blogger coffebreak said...

wowieeeee!!!! i did ! i did !!! i did!!!!! :d

4:53 am, March 12, 2007  
Blogger AP said...

Remarkably as you will, this happens to me too often to deserve such laurels (especially on a space as dynamic as this), which means I have either too many photos or too many haircuts.

9:32 am, March 12, 2007  
Blogger Puja said...

You look like you are in the middle of a happy tuneful song in your pic. But then again, it could always be protest music. Happy protest music though, if there are such.

1:20 pm, March 17, 2007  
Blogger Manu Saxena said...

Lavanya, exactly what causes you to ecstatically exclaim, "I did, I did!" What is it that you did? It's all rather hazy to me.

Anjul, 'on a space as dynamic as this'? Are you trying to make fun of me? Because if you are, well, frankly, there's not much I can do about it. But it'll be nice to know.

Puja, I'm not. And there isn't.

3:09 pm, March 22, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home